The Trump White House has opened a new and troubling chapter in its ongoing confrontation with the American press. What began as rhetorical attacks during the 2016 campaign has now evolved into an institutionalized effort: the launch of an official government webpage dedicated to publicly calling out journalists and news outlets whose reporting the president disputes.
As the White House escalates its attacks on journalists, independent reporting has never been more essential. I’m committed to pushing back with verified facts, rigorous analysis—but I can only continue this work with reader support. If you value journalism that challenges disinformation rather than amplifies it, please consider becoming a subscriber. Your subscription helps sustain the kind of independent reporting this administration is actively trying to undermine.
Subscribe
Unveiled over the weekend, the site brands itself with the tagline “Misleading. Biased. Exposed.” and showcases a rotating “Hall of Shame.”
The feature highlights selected stories from news organizations the administration claims have misrepresented the president’s actions or statements. Among this week’s targets are the Boston Globe, CBS News, and the Independent, which the page accuses of inaccurately reporting on comments in which President Donald Trump allegedly suggested that six Democratic lawmakers should be executed—claims the outlets reported after releasing a video urging military personnel to refuse illegal orders.
Public criticism of the media is nothing new for Trump, who has spent years describing journalists as “dishonest,” “corrupt,” and “enemies of the people.” But the creation of an official government website dedicated to singling out journalists marks a significant escalation. No longer confined to social media posts or campaign rallies, the administration’s attacks have been formalized into a government-branded digital tool.
By hosting media-targeting content on an official .gov domain, the White House is using the apparatus of the federal government to amplify the president’s grievances and shape public perception of the press. This step blurs the line between partisan messaging and government communication, raising concerns among First Amendment scholars and press freedom advocates.
The launch of the site coincides with a wave of intensified personal attacks against individual journalists, particularly women, from major outlets including ABC, CBS, The New York Times, and Bloomberg. These confrontations—often broadcast live during press briefings or shared widely on social media—serve to both discredit the reporters involved and discourage others from asking probing questions.
This strategy aims to suppress independent scrutiny of the administration by intimidating journalists and eroding public trust in reputable news sources. The public shaming component of the new government webpage further reinforces this dynamic.
The administration’s tracker has included a wide array of mainstream news organizations, signaling that no outlet is too large or too established to escape the president’s criticism. Among the media organizations featured are:
The use of official government platforms to attack journalists represents a significant moment in the relationship between the executive branch and the free press. While presidents have long sparred with reporters, the formalization of these attacks into government infrastructure risks normalizing hostility toward the press as a governing strategy.
By leveraging the power and visibility of official channels, the administration amplifies its message that the press is untrustworthy, biased, or malicious—an assertion many fear could erode democratic norms that rely on independent journalism as a check on power.
As the Trump White House continues to escalate its confrontations with reporters, the implications extend far beyond the political news cycle. What is at stake is not just the credibility of individual stories, but the future of a free and independent press in the United States.