The United States Just Got Downgraded on Press Freedom — It's a Five Alarm Fire

The international community is raising the alarm — and for good reason.

Today, CIVICUS — a global civil society alliance that tracks civic freedoms in 197 countries — officially downgraded the United States to a “narrowed” status on its press freedom watchlist. That term might sound technical or abstract. It’s not. It’s a flashing red warning light.

In CIVICUS's own words: “The targeting of journalists for documenting dissent while defunding public media is a clear red flag.” That’s diplomatic language for something more severe — the kind of state behavior we’re used to seeing in authoritarian regimes.

I started this newsletter because I believe journalism should speak for the people — not around them, not over them, and never just to the powerful. It should inform, empower, and inspire. It should make people uncomfortable when necessary. And it should never, ever stay silent in the face of corruption.

But I can’t do this alone. No independent journalist can.

That’s why I’m asking — if you believe in this mission, if you believe in the truth — to consider becoming a paid subscriber today.

The United States now finds itself grouped with countries where democratic norms are rapidly eroding, where freedom of the press is increasingly treated as a threat rather than a safeguard, and where governments are using their power to distort reality rather than reveal it.

Let’s call it what it is: a five-alarm fire.

The downgrade didn’t happen in a vacuum.

In just the first six months of his second term, President Donald Trump has unleashed an unprecedented wave of legal attacks on major news outlets. He sued CBS News over interviews with Vice President Kamala Harris. He sued the Wall Street Journal, its parent companies, and several reporters following an investigation into his long-documented ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. He sued the Des Moines Register for publishing poll numbers that didn’t favor him.

This isn’t politics. This is punishment.

It’s the calculated weaponization of the legal system to chill journalism and suppress accountability. These lawsuits aren’t designed to win — they’re designed to silence. They drain resources. They intimidate editors. They make newsrooms think twice before they hit publish. And they send a clear message to journalists: you will pay a price for telling the truth.

We’ve seen this tactic before — just not in America. Until now.

While the White House wages a legal war on journalism, it’s also aggressively working to defund and dismantle public media institutions.

NPR, PBS, and other independent public broadcasters are facing severe cuts. Funding for climate journalism, investigative teams, and civic education programming is being slashed. Programs meant to serve rural, Indigenous, and underserved communities are being axed under the guise of “efficiency.”

This is not about saving money. It's about silencing platforms that don’t bend to political pressure.

The public square is being intentionally hollowed out. And while mainstream corporate media outlets can fall back on billion-dollar ad revenues, it’s public and independent media — the platforms actually committed to truth over profit — that are under direct assault.

And where are the big players in the media ecosystem during all of this?

Too many are looking the other way.

It’s not just fear. It’s financial interest. Mainstream outlets are often beholden to advertisers, corporate owners, and political alliances. Editorial independence gets traded for access. Investigations are softened or shelved altogether. Headlines are framed to “both-sides” even the most egregious abuses of power.

This silence isn’t accidental. Sometimes, it’s strategic. And that makes it even more dangerous.

When the institutions that are supposed to inform the public start choosing safety over truth, access over accountability, and profit over principle, they become part of the machinery of misinformation. They help normalize repression — not resist it.

That’s why independent journalism is not just important right now — it’s essential.

This newsletter answer to shareholders. It doesn’t pull punches to maintain relationships in Washington. It exists for one reason: to tell the truth as clearly, as directly, and as fearlessly as possible.

There’s no safety net. No corporate cushion. This kind of journalism lives or dies on whether people like you believe it matters.

And if you’re still reading, I believe you do.

Every subscription — paid or free — is a vote of confidence in independent journalism. But paid subscriptions in particular are what make this work sustainable. They fund the research, the reporting, the legal resources, the security, and the time it takes to publish work that powerful people don’t want you to see.

This newsletter doesn’t traffic in clickbait. It doesn’t recycle headlines or chase algorithms. What you read here is the product of deep sourcing, careful vetting, and a refusal to compromise.

And yes — sometimes it makes people uncomfortable. It’s supposed to.

Let’s be clear: this isn’t just about journalism. It’s about democracy.

The assault on the press is part of a broader campaign to consolidate power and eliminate checks on authority. We are watching, in real time, as institutions that were once considered sacred — a free press, an independent judiciary, transparent government — are being bent or broken to serve one man’s will.

That’s how autocracy starts. Not with a bang, but with a slow, deliberate corrosion of truth.

The lawsuits. The funding cuts. The threats. The fear. It all adds up.

And while mainstream media tiptoes around this crisis, the international community is taking notice. CIVICUS’s downgrade is not just a symbolic blow — it’s a flashing sign to the world that the U.S. can no longer be assumed to lead on democratic values.

So what now?

We fight back.

It’s not just about supporting me. It’s about protecting the idea that independent journalism still matters — and that it’s worth fighting for.

Your subscription doesn’t just help cover reporting expenses. It helps me push past the fear tactics. It allows this work to remain uncensored, unbought, and unbroken.

You’re not just reading this — you’re part of it.

And together, we can keep telling the stories they’d rather see buried. We can keep holding the line. We can keep building something stronger than the propaganda machine that’s trying to replace truth with spectacle.

This isn’t just a newsletter. It’s resistance. It’s accountability. It’s a lifeline for facts in an era of manufactured fiction.

Thank you for being here. Thank you for caring. And most of all, thank you for believing in a kind of journalism that doesn’t flinch — even when the pressure gets heavy.

We’re just getting started.

Let’s keep digging.